Magufuli badly shaken by Bobi Wine development

 Initially, many dismissed it as fake news, and others believed it was just a wild rumor from Azimio. However, it has now been confirmed, and some of you may have already seen the affidavit from John Gidongo presented to the Supreme Court of Kenya in support of Raila Odinga's petition. It's hard to find the right words to describe the impact of this document. It lays bare the exact methods used to steal the elections from the Kenyan people, revealing massive fraud orchestrated by a few individuals who sought to seize power through corrupt and illegal means.

What’s most striking is how the affidavit confirms much of what we've been discussing here. It explains many of the strange results we witnessed on August 9, 2022, and the days following the election. For example, people were puzzled by how Raila Odinga seemed to have fewer votes than other ODM candidates in the same polling stations, constituencies, or counties. John Gidongo’s affidavit provides the answers. It details how votes for Raila were stolen and manipulated in favor of other candidates, particularly in William Ruto's strongholds.

John Gidongo is no stranger to exposing corruption. He gained national prominence during the Anglo-Leasing scandal, where Kenya’s treasury lost billions. Despite offers of large sums of money to remain silent, he chose to speak out and even had to go into exile to protect his life. This is the same man who has now presented this explosive affidavit to the Supreme Court. Even if you're a UDA supporter or someone with limited political experience, you must acknowledge the seriousness of this document from a man who genuinely loves his country.

James Orengo has also described this petition as a "bombshell," and having seen many similar petitions in the past, he emphasizes that this one is especially significant due to the overwhelming evidence. The affidavit is a detailed insider account of how the election was manipulated. According to the affidavit, votes in the Rift Valley were inflated for Ruto, while Raila’s legitimate votes were reduced or redirected to Ruto, a pattern that was repeated in many other regions.

One of the most astonishing aspects of this affidavit is that it names individuals involved in the rigging process, which lends credibility to the claims, as these people would likely take legal action if they felt slandered. The document provides an insider’s account of how election results were altered, even in the UDA tallying center, which seemed to hold more power than the official IEBC center.

The affidavit shows that the results that were publicly declared were far from accurate, with widespread manipulation occurring across polling stations. This document presents such a level of detail that it’s difficult to dismiss it as mere fiction—it is much too precise, too shocking to be fabricated.

For those who are still skeptical, this affidavit is likely to be a game-changer. It provides not only an insider’s testimony but also corroborates other independent evidence showing that the results were tampered with. If the Supreme Court takes this into account, it could fundamentally alter the outcome of the election, perhaps even leading to a rerun or the invalidation of the results entirely.

If you're keen on understanding this affidavit and its implications in full, I urge you to take a deeper look at the detailed analysis and documents related to it. This could very well be the most significant piece of evidence to emerge in Kenya’s electoral history, and it’s not something that should be ignored.