Is the USA a Friend or a Deadly Foe?

By Mwarang'ethe

In the on - going referendum campaigns, the RED side has accused the USA ambassador, Mr Michael Ranneberger of taking sides with the GREEN side. In response to this accusation, the ambassador has responded that he is only engaging in civil education and such would be expected of a friend of Kenyans. For more details please see here and here:

Now, the question is this, is the USA a friend of Kenyans as “she” loudly claims or a deadly enemy? Many Kenyans and many around the world view the America government as pursuing friendly policies towards us. We beg to differ. We differ because America is not a friend, but, a vampire that has been consuming the third world and especially we, the African people. We shall present our case, not by appealing to emotions, but, by exposing some little known foreign policy objectives and behaviour of the American government since 1945.

It was in 1945 when the economic leadership of the world was passed from the British Empire to the fledging American Empire. We know that, in the heat of the 2 World War, the American leadership required Britain to free Africa. We also know that, there were some serious plans to industrialise Africa. However, that is as far as this “friend” of Africans went. As the USA embarked on Marshall Plan to revive Europe and Japan, some far sighted Americans senators and we may say, lovers of humanity asked the USA to extend Marshall Plan to the whole globe including Africa.

Instead of such a sensible and decent approach, the USA chose to waste FIVE times enough of industrial capital, resources and labour to have industrialized the whole world in the so called Cold War, whose sole objective was suppression of emerging 3rd world freedom. If the USA had made these resources available to the dispossessed, they would have produced their own social capital and improved their living standards. Instead of such a meaningful approach to the third world problems, the USA came up with the idea of aid. When we see that, 80% of that aid goes back to the USA via its exports, and the fact that, it requires imposition of friendly leaders by force if need be, we begin to see that, the sole objective of this aid is to subsidise the American industry and not to develop Africa. Is this how a friend behaves towards his friends?

In 1970’s, the USA commissioned a report on future “threats” to its economic hegemony. The result of this study was National Security Memorandum 200 (“NSM 200”) which was quietly declassified in 1990. Among other things, this report says that: "The U.S. economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less-developed countries. That fact gives the U.S. enhanced interests in the political, economic and social stability of the supplying countries. Wherever a lessening of population can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resources, supplies and to the "economic interests of the United States." Note that, the “economic interest of the United States” means the interest of the U.S. corporations and multinationals which must over ride our own interests.

Flowing from this report, we are now used to the idea that, Africa is poor because it is over populated. It is from these malicious intentions, we are asked to cut down our population. Filled such untold ignorance our mental slaves are telling us that, “We may not be economically sustainable if we continue with this trend (of high population growth),” warned Ms Cecilia Kimemia of the UN Population Fund. Echoing these ignorant outbursts, Ms Pamela Onduso of Pathfinder International tells u that: “We need to manage our population growth so that the economic growth can catch on.” It is with such “wisdom,” we are told that, Family planning is the “missing link” needed to take the country to the promised land of “a healthy workforce, enough jobs, educated workers, and a modern infrastructure”. In other words, cut the Kenyan population to 20 million, and we shall be in Nirvana. What rubbish! More so, many think that, controlling African population growth is only a matter of contraceptives and abortion. Well, the measures include wars, genocide, famines and diseases.

If you doubt what we have written above about use of diseases to control population, please read this and choose what to believe. On 29, July, 1969, the Department of Defence requested $ 10 million from Congress to fund the development of a synthetic biological agent. This money was approved. Dr MacArthur from Pentagon described the agent this way:

There are two things about the biological agent field I would like to mention. One is the possibility of technological surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and eminent biologists believe that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired.

Is not wise before God and man to ask, why did the USA military want to produce a biological organism which has no natural immunity? Did they succeed? If so, who was the guinea pig? And if so, what were the results? Some will say conspiracy theory. No it is conspiracy fact. Read it from the horse’s mouth and while at it, see the red coloured sections:

Back to the population, the truth is this. Africa’s population density is around 15 per square kilometre, Europe is 89 per square kilometre, and Asia is 52 per square kilometre while America is 16 per square kilometre. From these statistics, the population problem is in Europe not in Africa. The question then is why is Europe with such a high population density not told to reduce its population? Simple. The intention to depopulate Africa as required by Global 200 Report is meant to destroy Africa’s economic base by reducing its potential consumer base.

So, why is Europe able to cope with its overpopulation? Simple. Because of its economic structure it is able to cope with such massive population. Thus, the real question is not our numbers, but, what kind of economic structure can support our population density of mere 15 per square per kilometre. So, why is our “friend” USA pushing population control as EUGENICS and not helping Africa to restructure its economy to support its meagre population?

When Nero, oh sorry, Obama entered the White House, many Africans were jubilant. We understand. However, what many have failed to understand is that, Obama is just a puppet. One of the main guys behind the curtain is a man called Zbigniew Brzezinski. This man is the key adviser to Obama on foreign policy, i.e. foreign interference. Why are we interested with this man? Because he is the author of one of the most racist USA policy to have ever come out.

He authored National Security Council Memorandum - 46 whose subject was: Black Africa and the U.S. Black Movement. Having noted the dependence of the U.S on African minerals, he called for suppression of any African leader who does not agree with the U.S. interests. Even more depressing, he called for measures to prevent ANY JOINT endeavours between Africans of the soil (Africans in Africa) and the Africans of the blood (Africa Americans). This policy although authored during apartheid times, remains in place today. If you think we are engaged in conspiracy theories, and assuming this document is not gathering dust like other “brilliant ideas” in our government shelves as some people tell us, please read the report here.

In defending the current viceroy against attacks by NO side, Timothy Kaberia reminds us of the service Smith Hempstone rendered to us in 1990’s at The fact that, Hempstone was seen to “help” us against our “enemy” Moi, is self evident to many Kenyans that US is our friend. Failure to appreciate Hegelian dialectics is very dangerous in these times. Hempstone was helping us install bogus multipartyism to detract us from fundamental issues.

If you doubt, sample this. Without going further down to assess the role of 18% interest imposed on our fragile economy in early 1980’s, we can trace Kenyan deterioration in the economic side from 1987 in the collapse of international coffee market. In 1987, the system of quotas established under the International Coffee Agreement (ICA) started to fall apart and world prices plummeted. A lethal blow to coffee exporters was delivered in June 1989 when the ICA reached a deadlock due to political pressures from Washington on behalf of US coffee traders. At the end of a historic meeting of producers held in Florida, coffee prices plunged in a matter of months by more than 50%. With the coffee quotas lifted in July, 1989, the Free On Board (FOB) price in Mombasa dropped from US$ 1.31 a pound in May 1989 to $ 0.60 in December.

As one would expect such a drop in coffee prices wrecked havoc with our economy. Kenyans, led by Hempstone and other propaganda machines heaped all blame on “corrupt” Moi. As American corporations made billions from our “cheap” coffee which was orchestrated by the US government, and which devastated our economy, the American ambassador in Nairobi was on our side. What a true friend in deed. With a devastated economy and debts incurred from 1960 and 70’s, the IMF and WB told us we must sell our jewels. When Moi hesitated to carry out this economic genocide, IMF/WB would cut loans. Seeing Moi as stupid and ignorant, we would join the IMF/WB and international community to push Moi. It was at this moment, in utter desperation, Moi made an eternal observation that, Mwafrika ni kitu chafu kama Ngozi yake.

After the 2007 disaster, we set up a busy body which calls for more tax called National Cohesion and Integration Commission. We are told that, this body will ensure we do not fight along tribal lines. But, what does our “friend” view these matters? In one its Psychological Warfare Manual for special forces, our friend teaches them how to convey selected information and indicators to foreign target audiences (TAs) to influence their EMOTIONS, MOTIVES, OBJECTIVE REASONING and ultimately, the behaviour of governments, organisations, groups and individuals. The purpose of our “friend’s’” psychological warfare is to create neutral, friendly or hostile foreign groups (DO NOT MISS WORDS CREATE ENEMIES) the emotions, attitudes or desired behaviour that SUPPORTS the achievement of U.S. national objectives and military mission.

This manual goes further to say that, in so doing, the psychological warfare should aim at influencing not only policy and decisions, but also the ability to govern. Having said so, this manual gives a number of psychological warfare techniques to be employed. Of interest to us, is this: “exploit ethnic, cultural, religious or economic differences.” Is it possible that our “friend” is conducting psychological warfare against us?