Wednesday, March 13, 2024

Revealed: Ruto plan for when Wako team will open servers shortly to find a big Raila win

Revealed: Ruto plan for when Wako team will open servers shortly to find a big Raila win

Recently, honorable Opiyo Wandayi, who is the minority leader at the National Assembly released a statement that had Azimio supporters over the moon. But many stopped themselves quickly because it all sounded too good to be true. Indeed I received some emails asking me; "Chris, what does all this mean?" 

Well, in case you're still in the dark and have no idea what I am talking about... All Hon Wandayi did was to release a list of the Azimio side of a panel to do an audit on the 2022 presidential elections. 

Most Kenyans know that this is not a small matter because to do an audit, one would need to access the servers with the presidential election results 2022 and all of them at that!

Now, before we go into the far reaching implications of what most Kenyans hope is about to happen, let us start this story at the beginning. 

You will remember that going into the national dialogue talks that halted streets protests (Maandamano) Azimio had three irreducible minimums. 

Number one; That the Ruto government should make deliberate efforts to bring down the cost of living (instead of doing the opposite by hiking taxes)

Number two; Opening the servers with the real presidential results.  

Number three: That Ruto should immediately stop re-constituting a new IEBC. 

And of course we all know that Azimio lost one out of those three irreducible minimum demands. And that is the cost of living where there was no agreement between Azimio and Kenya Kwanza at the Bomas talks. 

Actually Azimio had to make a very big decision because going into the talks, they had said if there was no agreement on the cost of living then there was nothing else they were going to discuss with Kenya Kwanza and the talks would therefore collapse. 

So, why did Raila and Azimio change their mind and let cost of living slide?

There was a very good reason which you will never hear spoken out at any press conference or even a politician's speech. And really it is just simple logic. 

Let me simplify it with a very common Swahili saying that goes thus; If a child cries for a sharp razor, just give it to them. If your child is crying because they want the razor to play with and you know the consequences (they will hurt themselves), you can still decide to let them have it so that they learn a lesson the hard way and then you will never have that trouble with them again).

You see the cost of living is a very sensitive political hot potato that has brought down too many governments and even empires since the beginning of time. There is no debate amongst Kenyans that it has finished Ruto and his Kenya Kwanza brigade politically. Nobody on that side of the divide has a political future, even if they do not know it yet.

And so Azimio decided to quit struggling against stubborn Ruto on cost of living and decided to let him "cook" in his own fat. And of course for some very bizarre reason Ruto and his chaps still don't see this. In their minds they can do what they want (taking away money from people's pockets) and then when the elections come around they will find a strategy to convince Kenyans to vote them back in or they'll simply rig themselves back in. I guess the thinking is that since Daniel arap Moi with all the Western Powers against his administration, towards the end of his reign) still managed to remain in power, then that is proof it can be done and therefore since Ruto and his men view themselves as being super smart, they are sure that they too can do it. That seems to be  the thinking around this administration.

For Azimio it was felt that it was wise to at least win something. Like opening the servers and the IEBC manenos. That was obviously better than nothing. And in any case the cost of living component they had lost would inevitably be the downfall of their political opponents, which would be doing Azimio a favour.

To me it makes perfect sense and in their place I would have made the very same decision. 

Now let us focus on this panel to go through the 2022 presidential elections results with a fine tooth comb, so to speak. 

This really has to start with opening the servers -- all of them. BUT let us just face reality. There is no way Ruto would have agreed to this (it is all signed and sealed in the NADCO report which is being tabled in Parliament to be quickly passed shortly) unless UDA had a plan in place. A plan to guarantee that the result of this audit will not remove Ruto from Power. Because most Kenyans know what is in those servers.

And there are many ways of doing this in Parliament because after all Ruto has the numbers in the National Assembly.
 
For example, they could introduce a small clause saying that all the findings of this forensic audit can only be implemented after 2027. 

Actually, it is sad but true that there are many options here to frustrate Azimio supporters and justice. One which has been used successfully before is to pile up all the blame on IEBC. This is the body that has the legal mandate to carry out elections and when things go wrong it is actually impossible legally to shift the blame anywhere else, even if you have the evidence. And so this would be a neat and very viable option for Ruto.

And indeed history very clearly tells us that ALL Wafula Chebukati predecessors (without exception) have ended up being hanged out to dry. From Samuel Kivuitu to Issak Hassan. 

There is something else. If the Wako forensic audit proves that the presidential election results were a total mess, that does not automatically hand over victory to Raila Odinga. 

In 2007 when Kibaki rigged himself back for a second term, something very clever was done that I believe had foreign assistance partly because it was just too smart (legally). I'm not saying that Kenyans are not that smart but I recently saw something very similar in a country very far away from Kenya that gave me reason to suspect that maybe the experts used in 2007 were the same experts used recently in that other foreign country. 

What exactly did they do in 2007 in the presidential election in Kenya? After stealing Raila votes massively countrywide, these people who rigged Kibaki back in, went to Raila strongholds and also fiddled with the votes there, giving Raila extra votes here and there. 

That changed everything because from a legal position the evidence showed that, Kibaki stole votes but Raila also stole some votes. And thus the conclusion was that there was no way the real winner could be known because both candidates stole votes. 

Clearly the appointment of this panel to forensically audit the 2022 presidential elections is not an open and shut case. There are just too many possible outcomes and scenarios and most of them will never see justice done.

But all is not lost for those Kenyans who would like justice to be done. Other things could happen. 

For instance the revelations from the server of the real results of the presidential elections could have such a huge psychological impact on Kenyans that it could trigger unrest and a demand for justice that will be impossible for authorities to resist.

Thank you for forwarding and sharing this article

===


Magistrates in Kenya: Two different "CCTV" Faces Of The Judiciary In Kenya

Nobody wants Felicien Kabuga in their country

The day Kibaki wives fought over inheriting his parliamentary seat


Blog post UP NEXT:

Top corrupt Kenya police cops told Kavuludi: Stop investigating us or we will kill you (they even delivered a "graphic message")



More info on Kenya land goons in this video;
Read also;





Tuesday, March 12, 2024

Kenyan bus company and 15 others sanctioned by US over support for al Shabaab: What does it mean?

Kenyan bus company and 15 others sanctioned by US over support for al Shabaab: What does it mean?

In a recent move over the last few hours, by the United States Treasury Department, a Kenyan bus company finds itself among a list of 16 entities being sanctioned for allegedly providing support to the Somali militant group al Shabaab. 

Crown Bus company, is accused of aiding the extremist group by facilitating the transportation of fighters, weapons, and other supplies. This action by the US government comes as part of ongoing efforts to disrupt the financial networks that fund al Shabaab's activities. By imposing sanctions on entities believed to be contributing to the group's operations, the hope is to limit its ability to carry out acts of violence and terrorism. 

While details about the specific role and involvement of the Kenyan bus company remain undisclosed, the sanctions reflect the seriousness with which the US government regards the situation. The identification and sanctioning of such entities are part of a wider international effort to combat terrorism and ensure the safety and security of countries in the region. 

Al Shabaab is a militant group based in East Africa, primarily operating in Somalia but also known for launching attacks in neighboring countries, particularly Kenya. The group seeks to establish a fundamentalist Islamic state in Somalia and has been responsible for numerous high-profile terror attacks in the region.

Since 2006, Al Shabaab has conducted attacks against Kenyan military and civilian targets, leading to a significant loss of life and property. The group has exploited the porous Kenya-Somalia border, using it as a passage for fighters and weapons. The Kenyan government, in response, has ramped up its security efforts along the border and within its territory.

Al Shabaab's activities in Kenya primarily revolve around recruitment and radicalization of youth, conducting attacks, and fundraising through illicit activities. Sadly, the group has managed to infiltrate various sectors of Kenyan society, including transport, which leads us to the story of the sanctioned bus company.

Overview of the US Sanctions and Their Impact on the Bus Company

In this significant move by the United States Treasury Department, sixteen entities, including the Kenyan bus company, have been targeted with sanctions. These sanctions are part of a broader strategy by the US government to disrupt the financial networks that support Al Shabaab’s operations.

Sanctions translate to a series of economic and trade restrictions applied by one or more countries against a targeted self-governing state, entity, or individual. In the case of the bus company, the sanctions could involve freezing of assets, ban on financial transactions, and restrictions on doing business with US entities.

The impact on the bus company is likely to be severe. It will endure significant financial strain, as it will be unable to transact with US entities or those in the US jurisdiction. Further, other international companies may be reluctant to do business with this company for fear of secondary sanctions.

Reasons for the Sanctions and Evidence of the Bus Company's Support for Al Shabaab

The sanctions against the Kenyan bus company were levied due to allegations of it aiding Al Shabaab. The company is said to have facilitated the transportation of fighters, weapons, and other supplies for the militant group. While specific details are still undisclosed, it is clear that the evidence was compelling enough for the Treasury Department to impose sanctions.

The decision to sanction the bus company sends a clear message about the seriousness with which the US government views entities supporting terrorist activities. It forms part of a broader strategy to dismantle the financial networks that sustain groups like Al Shabaab.

It also places a spotlight on the role that some private entities play, knowingly or unknowingly, in aiding and abetting terrorism. It's a wake-up call for businesses to be more vigilant and ensure they are not inadvertently supporting such activities.

Reactions and Responses from the Bus Company and Kenyan Government

The announcement of the sanctions has, understandably, elicited reactions from various quarters. The Kenyan government, which has been grappling with the threat of Al Shabaab, expressed concern over the alleged involvement of a Kenyan entity in supporting the militant group.

The bus company, on the other hand, has yet to issue an official response. It will be interesting to see how it navigates this crisis, both legally and from a public relations standpoint. There are likely to be tough questions ahead, and the company’s responses will be critical.

The response from the Kenyan public has been mixed. While some express shock and disappointment, others view it as a wake-up call for stricter oversight of businesses, especially those operating in sensitive sectors such as transport.

Similar Cases of US Sanctions on Companies Supporting Terrorist Organizations

This is not the first instance of the US sanctioning entities for suspected links with terrorist organizations. There have been several similar cases in the past. For example, in 2019, the US Treasury Department sanctioned three entities based in Turkey, Afghanistan, and the UAE for providing financial and logistical support to ISIS.

In another case, in 2020, the US sanctioned six Nigerian nationals for their involvement in a significant cybercrime scheme that supported various terrorist groups. These cases demonstrate the willingness of the US to use sanctions as a tool to disrupt the financial networks of terrorist organizations.

International Efforts to Combat Terrorism Financing through Sanctions

The move to impose sanctions on entities suspected of supporting terrorism is part of a larger international strategy to combat terrorism financing. Countries around the world, often under the umbrella of the United Nations, have made concerted efforts to crack down on sources of funding for terrorist organizations.

These efforts include setting up international frameworks and regulations to detect and prevent illegal money transfers, strengthening intelligence sharing among countries, and promoting public-private partnerships in the fight against terrorism financing.

The effectiveness of these efforts is evident in the significant decrease in the number of terrorist attacks in recent years. However, the fight is far from over, and continuous vigilance is required to ensure that terrorist organizations do not find new ways to fund their operations.

The sanctioning of the Kenyan bus company by the US Treasury Department serves as a stark reminder of the complex and multi-faceted nature of the fight against terrorism. It highlights the need for vigilance at all levels – government, businesses, and the public.

Thank you for forwarding and sharing this article

===

Magistrates in Kenya: Two different "CCTV" Faces Of The Judiciary In Kenya

Nobody wants Felicien Kabuga in their country

The day Kibaki wives fought over inheriting his parliamentary seat


Blog post UP NEXT:

Top corrupt Kenya police cops told Kavuludi: Stop investigating us or we will kill you (they even delivered a "graphic message")



More info on Kenya land goons in this video;
Read also;