Ruto's chief secret cunning advisor unmasked: The great and real danger to Kenyans

Those close to President Ruto and those who have dealt with him in the past insist that his style of doing things does not leave any room for advisers or confidants. While this may have served him well in the past, it is a deadly approach when it comes to being president of any country on earth. As the numerous goofs that have already unfolded proves. 

 

Here's why Kenya is in deep trouble and it is only a matter of time before a decision that cannot be undone or mitigated is made and the result may be unprecedented disaster...

When a president assumes the role of their own chief advisor, it can pose significant dangers and challenges to the country and the individual. The concept of a chief advisor is to provide objective and expert guidance to the president, ensuring that decisions are well-informed and considerate of various perspectives. However, when the president takes on this role themselves, several undesirable issues may arise.

Firstly, being one's own chief advisor can lead to a lack of diverse opinions and viewpoints. Advisors typically bring different backgrounds, expertise, and experiences to the table, which helps in making well-rounded decisions. Without this diversity, there is a risk of tunnel vision and limited perspectives influencing important choices.

Secondly, presidents who act as their own chief advisors may face difficulties in maintaining objectivity. It is human nature to have biases and personal preferences that can cloud judgment. Having an external advisor helps counterbalance these biases by providing an impartial viewpoint.

Furthermore, being both the president and chief advisor can result in an overwhelming workload for an individual. Presidents already have numerous responsibilities that require their attention; taking on additional advisory duties may quickly lead to burnout or neglecting other crucial aspects of governance.

Lastly, having a president as their own chief advisor undermines accountability mechanisms. External advisors serve as checks and balances by questioning decisions and holding leaders accountable for their actions. When presidents solely rely on themselves for advice, there is a higher likelihood of unchecked decision-making without proper scrutiny.

In conclusion, while it is essential for presidents to have autonomy in decision-making processes, assuming the role of one's own chief advisor carries inherent dangers. The absence of diverse perspectives, potential bias or lack of objectivity, increased workload burden on the president's shoulders, and diminished accountability are all factors that should be carefully considered when evaluating this approach to governance.

What has already gone terribly wrong because Ruto is his own chief advisor

---

In recent years, concerns about government surveillance in Kenya have become increasingly prevalent, with many individuals worried about the extent to which their privacy is being invaded.  Read full article on How the government is monitoring your cell phone

See also: How Social Media Purge In Kenya Protected Corruption Part 2

Twitter In Kenya Fully "Controlled" By Itumbi And Fake Social Media Accounts (From India)

---