NASA wants to divorce Kenya

 The Resignation of Attorney General Githu Muigai: A Deep Mystery

The recent resignation of Kenya’s Attorney General, Githu Muigai, has sent shockwaves across the country, sparking speculation about the reasons behind his unexpected departure. Naturally, Kenyans are asking: why did he resign? Was it out of frustration, or is there something deeper at play?

Why Do Advisors Resign?

Historically, advisors resign for two primary reasons: frustration or strategic positioning. In many cases, advisors resign in a huff, often because their advice is consistently ignored. Being an advisor can be emotionally taxing, as repeated dismissal of one’s counsel can lead to dissatisfaction and eventual resignation. Some advisors, overwhelmed by this emotional strain, have even taken drastic steps, such as ending their lives.

Another possibility is strategic maneuvering. Leaders sometimes orchestrate resignations to reposition advisors in other roles. For instance, we saw former DPP Keriako Tobiko resign, only to be swiftly appointed to the Cabinet. Could Githu Muigai’s resignation be a similar scenario?

Did Githu Muigai Resign in Protest?

It is difficult to believe that Githu Muigai resigned out of principle. His record as Attorney General has been one of unwavering loyalty to the establishment. Since his appointment in 2011 under the Grand Coalition Government, Muigai has consistently supported the government’s stance, rarely—if ever—showing any semblance of independence or defiance. Unlike other legal advisors, he has never made a decision or statement that was legally sound but politically unpopular.

One would expect an Attorney General to occasionally make decisions that align with the constitution rather than political expediency. Yet, Muigai’s tenure has been characterized by total alignment with the presidency, leaving little room to imagine that he resigned in protest. Furthermore, would the Jubilee government, known for its obsession with saving face, even allow such a resignation to happen?

The Jubilee Government’s Obsession with Saving Face

The Jubilee administration has repeatedly demonstrated its unwillingness to appear weak or admit to failure. A prime example is its defiance of court orders in the case of lawyer Miguna Miguna. Instead of complying with the judiciary’s directives, the government chose to deport its own citizen, prioritizing the preservation of its image over adherence to the rule of law. This pattern makes it highly unlikely that the government would accept a resignation rooted in dissent.

What Could Be the Real Reason?

While we may not know the true motive behind Muigai’s resignation, several theories are worth considering. One possibility is that his resignation is part of a broader political strategy, with Muigai being lined up for another role. Another is that his resignation is linked to internal dynamics within the Jubilee government, which has faced increasing scrutiny over its legal and political actions.

A Track Record of Loyalty

To understand why Muigai’s resignation is perplexing, we must consider his legacy. Since taking office, he has never publicly challenged the establishment. There is no record of him offering advice or making a decision that caused political discomfort to the government of the day. This unwavering loyalty raises questions about why he would suddenly choose to resign.

Final Thoughts

In my view, Githu Muigai’s resignation is unlikely to be a protest. His history as a staunch defender of the establishment makes this scenario implausible. Instead, this resignation likely serves a deeper, strategic purpose, which we may not understand fully until much later.

The Jubilee government, known for its political acrobatics, may be orchestrating this move to achieve a specific objective. Until the truth emerges, we can only speculate, but one thing is certain: this resignation is no ordinary event.